Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo
Sure they were. We gave them a 4th round draft pick for Herm. They've been Herm-free for three years longer than we have. That's a decided advantage.
And yet, there were the Jets, right after Herm left, taking a tackle AND a center in the first round of the 2006 draft. Now, you'll reach the breaking point if the Chiefs draft a tackle, but then say that you wish we'd do the same as the Jets, who just three seasons ago spent not one, but two first rounders on offensive linemen - linemen who are now counted as some of the best in the business and provide excellent protection and push for the Jets running and passing game.
But you'd hate it if the Chiefs did the same, but want them to do the same.
I'm confused...
|
I'm confused too. Because the corn i shit out last night ended up inside your skull.
Did the Jets draft a LT to replace the other first round LT they had already drafted two years prior? NO.
No. They didn't already have a first round pick at LT. So what they did is actually nothing like what you are advocating. They have zero in common.
And in fact what New York did after drafting their first round LT is then, 3 years later, trade up to #5 to pick a QBOTF.
We now have our second chance to do EXACTLY WHAT THE JETS DID: Draft a QB at #5 after having acquired a LT in a previous draft. And you're crying like a bitch about us wanting to do that.
You don't have the first god damn clue about what teams have done, or should do.
And how's that dumb secondary pick they made doing? What's his name....Revis?
Yeah, they totally blew an opportunity to draft OL there, for a silly playmaker in the secondary. What were they thinking, Sack of Testes?
Holy shit they passed on Joe Staley and Ben Grubbs for a ****ing CB.