Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones
One of us used the Cleveland Browns as a model for how to appropriately address Free Agency. The other one pointed out the fact that those particular transactions aren't likely to have stellar material results. And went on to suggest that the Draft might present better alternatives for a team in this position (still not quite ready to contend).
And please...for the love of all that is holy...
Please stop with the Internet tough guy shit.
Let's just have a conversation like civil adults shall we?
|
Again, with the absolutist dipshit tripe.
Did I say these transactions were the fulcrum by which their Super Bowl success will tip?
No.
When have I ever marginalized the importance of the draft? Ever?
At the same time, if you have holes at places like ted backer, right tackle, or backup RB, I'm in no way bothered with addressing much more important positions in the draft.
Again, you are forced to construct a strawman by assuming that this rebuild isn't a multi-year effort.
I don't give a **** if we don't draft a RT or Ted backer this year. I'd much rather invest valuable picks at impact positions. We have 10 picks and about 20 holes.
Not everything has to be fixed now, but if you can find guys like Pashos or Fujita to fill a hole for two years who will 1) play at a decent level and are 2) cheap, then you are working FA correctly.
Put please, continue inventing bullshit to sustain your argument.