Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla
The Kurt Warner things is interesting. In STL, he had a solid line, great back, great receivers. In AZ (I know they didn't win, but they did everything but win), he had no backs, no line, and a pretty porous D. It was basically Warner and his receivers that just about ended up Super Bowl champs. How does one account for an interesting talent like him? Should he have been drafter higher?
|
he wasn't drafted at all, IIRC