Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16
Everything only sounds like what you're describing it as if you can't read particularly well. Point of dispute: when we say need at 36 we're also talking about BPA at the same time - win/win, McCluster wasn't BPA at the time and Arenas was like a two round reach, no one would argue against an LT at #5 in any draft unless your team already has one - like the Chiefs - so there goes that mischaracterization, I know that I'll hear someone attempt to argue that some of us bitch about every single move the front office makes but I don't care because that is so stupid as to not warrant getting indignant over.
|
That's the thing people are ignoring - the value on the board was matching our most desperate needs perfectly at each pick.
You'll never convince me that a project slot WR, a marginal nickle CB prospect, who can return kicks and a TE are more valuable than pass rushers, ILB's, SS's and NT's in a 34 scheme.