Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
While I understand your point, you're assuming that the Chiefs should be drafting based on need.
I agree with your post that asks about whether McCluster, Arenas, or Moeaki offer better value than other similar guys at their position.
For McCluster, he offers a lot more versatility than Tate does. For Moeaki, he offers a lot more versatility--he's a terrific blocker who can catch the ball, while Graham is a high upside receiving TE who can't block. McCluster is a pick that's going to have to pass a significant sniff test, but if the intent is to use him as a Sproles type player where you move him around all over the field, it has potential to be a pretty decent pick.
|
If you're not drafting for need and you're not taking the best players available at the positions you're drafting, what exactly do you call your draft approach?