Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
But that's horseshit and you know it.
There's a HUGE difference between "value" today and value in two years.
Some of those guys that went lower will not live up to expectations because it happens every year.
The true qualifier will be if Pioli is right or wrong.
Not who they "could" have chosen.
|
I think the problem with the "could" factor is the fact that we are mad that the "could" would have been better players at more important positions.
Even if McCluster works out, or Arenas, or Moeaki, do they give you the same ROI that Clausen, Cody, Griffen, Graham, Williams, or any number of prospects would?
No.
So not only do you have the risk of uncertain players, you have a lesser potential positive return.
That's just ****ing foolish,and that's why they are poor picks.