Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By
I disagreed with you. You're making an erroneous claim. My pointing that out by breaking down a pair of terms does not make your point. You are essentially claiming to know why Cassel was running by giving an answer that runs counter to what he claims to be his reasoning.
That's just stupid.
|
Where did I claim to know why he was running.
I claimed that he ran when he didn't have to.
He ran even though it wasn't impacted by pressure.
Who gives a rat's ass as to why?