Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
Why do you keep ignoring that this team scored TWENTY-ONE POINTS PER GAME once Charles took over?
That's good for a 14-16 ranking most years, and plenty enough to win games, provided you can STOP THE ****ING RUN.
You keep talking around something you know you can't dispute:
That with even an average run defense last year, this team wins 6 games minimum, and potentially 8.
|
Because you're acting like a better offense wouldn't have won those games either. How many of our first 8 games would we have won if we didn't completely shit our pants on pass offense? Dallas, Oakland, arguably Baltimore. Given that 5 out of our last 8 games, we scored 14 points or less, you don't think offensive improvement was a priority?
If you improve our run defense, our defense still has major issues and our offense is just as bad as last year. Jamaal Charles is a hell of a back, but he's a 15-carry a game guy and without McCluster, he's the only damn guy on the field anybody on defense will pay attention to.
The idea that we could have improved this team to better than 8-8 based on 2 moves? That's ****ing insane.