So Sanders is probably done for the year with a torn bicep. Second time in two years.
I know VERY little about steroids, but my deeply held belief is that the NFL is very 'roided up, or HGH'ed up, or whatever. Can anyone who kows more about these things tell me whether this does or doesn't support such a belief?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Indy Star
Second, why does this keep happening to Sanders? It seems a little too simple to keep saying he just plays too recklessly for his own good. Anybody watch Ray Lewis play the game? Not exactly a tea party with that guy.
Is he just the unluckiest football player on the planet, a man whose flawed physiology is such that it renders him vulnerable to these kinds of injuries? You've got to admit, two biceps tendon tears, one on each arm, in two years is pretty unusual.
Whatever explains it, why it keeps happening, it remains a bottom-line shame the way it has stunted a potentially brilliant football career
|
http://www.indystar.com/article/2010...eached-the-end
Seems a bit like the "why, oh WHY have home runs suddenly gone astronomically higher the last few years? Could it be that the ball is being wound more tightly? Inquiring minds want to know...
