Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3
Are you kidding? This is two 3-0 teams making a trade. Obviously there is no collusion, so why on earth should this have even been considered veto worthy. The only way a trade should ever be vetoed is if there is suspected collusion. Clearly that isn't the case here.
|
I agree there was no collusion. I wasn't aware that was the standard for vetoing a trade in this league. It some leagues making such a lopsided trade without collusion can still be vetoed by a vote of the league members or commish. Like I said I'm 0-3 I don't care enough to fight over it.