Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan
Luddy hit .211 with San Diego(and believe it or not, Busch Stadium is considered a pitcher's park). He had a -1 WAR with the Padres(Wins above Replacement) Westbrook had a .9 WAR with the Cardinals. It's not that bad of a trade. Luddy would likely command the same amount of money or more than Westbrook.
|
What Ludwick did in San Diego is irrelevant to what he may have done here.
What he did here was pretty damn impressive.
Luddy's likely to be about $2 million/season less than Westbrook (he's only arb eligible) and even if he cost the same or more, that's fine - he's a better player.
It was a bad trade. Had we traded a mediocre 4th starter for a gold glove caliber RFer that is 2 seasons removed from winning a silver slugger and is about the same age as Matt Holliday, you'd be overcome with joy right now.
And with good reason. Only a moron of a general manager would make that trade.