Quote:
Originally Posted by Gif Horse
Charles was brought in to be a backup and he was fine in that role. I never bitched about him once. In fact, he was the third-string RB behind Kolby Smith, so to even compare his situation to McCluster's is ignorant.
When LJ got suspended and Smith broke something for the 50th time, Charles got his chance and...IMMEDIATELY RIPPED OFF 100 YARDS.
I'll be shocked if McGimmick produces 100 yards of total offense in a game this year.
|
Give me an f'ing break. Charles is a running back and no one expects mccluster to be charles. Why are you so obsessed with yardage? Know how many 100 yd games harvin had his rookie year? 1. Know how many reggie bush had in 2009? None. Know how many welker has had minus moss? None.
The past two weeks, the underneath checkdown has been there. In arizona, we were horrible at 3rd and long and often checked down. They need mccluster. I'd like to se a repeat of the jacksonville performance where he converted on several key third downs. If his role for 2010 is to help us improve us on third down, or to open opportunities for innocvative playcalling that's okay. If his role is a harvin or bush role its an important role, even if its not going to get you 1000 yards.