Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
I don't need to dispute anything, especially when you're ****ing full of shit.
Simply stating at the Falcons of 2009 were the same team as 2007 is ****ing dumb, as is stating the Bucs of 2010 are the same team as 2008.
Key players were brought into each franchise, whether it be Turner, Ryan, Baker, etc. and for Tampa, Freeman and the rest.
But go ahead an try to dispute that Tampa is starting SEVEN rookies because it would be laughable.
The difference between you and me, Asswipe, is that I'm knowledgeable about this shit and follow it everyday.
You talk out of your ass, then try to use the internet in your defense.
Kiss my ass, you ****ing douchelord.
|
Mike Smith took over in 2008 and had a good year then a decent one with mostly players from the previous regime.
Morris took over in 2009 and they played poorly and TB has had a good 2010 like KC with a lot of young players but mostly players left from before.
Where am I wrong again saying very few 2nd year regimes don't have their core players left from the previous regime?
Let's say for sake of argument TB fits your profile, name another team besides TB that has recently made a big jump with a huge number of new players?
You understand the term very few? So we are going to take rare exceptions and make that the norm?
Yes you are a genious and know so much more than me.
I'm the one who doesn't get it and talks out my ass. OK.