Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC
At little to serious actually.. Its just a message board, it has zero bearing on real life...
Who here takes any of this serious? I know I sure the hell dont.. Nothing said here has ever ever changed what happens in the chiefs organization.
|
One of the first rules of this place, don't get too worked up and serious about anything.
But even following his normal non-reasoning pattern, this one was just too funny.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by guardasill
(TheGuardian)
The truth is, if we had even a really solid game manager at QB, this is a 10 win team. We can run the ball, and we can cover. Stopping the run isn't what it used to be as this is a passing league now. And we've got that snuffed out. We have runners, solid WR's, a good looking return game, and weapons galore on offense. The defense looks like it might might jump up into the halfway rank area (16th or so) yet I think Cassel's lack of ability is going to cost us a handful of games.
I personally think Croyle would be the better option at this point.
|
So if he thought Croyle was a better option then, why couldn't he improve just like Cassel, with the same supporting cast improvments?
Especially a talented player that had done something at the College level, won a bowl game and was the MVP? Why couldn't this player improve as much as one that had "buffed pine" with his butt, to borrow from Hamas?