Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd
One of the first rules of this place, don't get too worked up and serious about anything.
But even following his normal non-reasoning pattern, this one was just too funny.
So if he thought Croyle was a better option then, why couldn't he improve just like Cassel, with the same supporting cast improvments?
Especially a talented player that had done something at the College level, won a bowl game and was the MVP? Why couldn't this player improve as much as one that had "buffed pine" with his butt, to borrow from Hamas?
|
I thought Croyle should of been given a chance earlier in the year...
Only difference is Cassel has had most if not all of the important reps and game time...
Croyle could possibly be just as good with the SAME amount of reps and game time.... But considering he hasnt had the SAME amount. I dont want to crown him the franchise savior just yet..
If Croyle gets the chance to start and play 2 straight seasons, I would expect him to be as good as Cassel. Until then? He is a backup and hopefully he plays well enough not to cost the Chiefs this game on Sunday.