So Whitlock parlayed his column about Haley into radio and TV appearances.
The discussion was too unfocused, Whitlock wanted to talk his nonsense about how Haley was anointed to head coach because his dad was a talent scout as if Haley had not been an assistant for 10+ years.
And then they bounced around to all the different ideas Whitlock has had over the years.
I am really uncomfortable with Whitlock trying to praise Pioli for taking a player's character into account in building a team, but then Whitlock himself defining character as depending on whether the player had a dad in the home.
Pioli assesses character but he does that by asking people that know the player about how the player treats people. Pioli does not rule out a player because the mother had the player out of wedlock.
So, Whitllock writes a nonsense article where he makes an outlandish critcism of Haley because he needs some exposure for his failing career and then he lies about Pioli who is supposedly praising.
Good for Whitlock that he begged his way into some exposure, unfortunately for him, exposure is a chance for him to blow it and he will blow it because he takes after mama and writes and talks in the feminine way.
If he was on NFL Network, Deion would ask to check his mancard because Whitlock has "too much wiggle in the hips" when he writes.
__________________
Where Ignorance is Bliss, 'Tis Folly to be Wise.
__
|