I suppose Whittles is "talented" ... maybe. A lot of people seem to think so, anyhow.
For me, though, it's very difficult to get past the absolutely inane subjects and opinion and appreciate the writing beneath. I have to say, however, that his last article (the Haley is a baby one) didn't seem particularly well-written, either from the standpoint of syntactic maturity or fluency.
Is it possible that many Star readers believe him to be talented simply because he compares well to the alternative pap?
FAX
|