Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
We've had much to enjoy, and team fitness is a promising, as are any number if 'intangibles,' but we have no idea if, objectively, we're all that much better than the team that took the field in September of 2009.
|
Dude. They won 4 games last year, some of them to very bad teams. 2 Games the year prior to that.
It's not easy to win in the NFL. They've obviously improved. Bowe has improved. Cassel has improved. The Protection has improved. The entire defense has improved. This team is much better.
Im not sure how anyone can watch these games and not see that, regardless of who they played. Last year, the Chiefs wouldn't have had 10 wins with this schedule.
Yeah, they're the weakest team in the AFC playoffs. Sure, they have a long way to go. but they won the AFC West and deserve to be there.
Both the Chargers and Raiders failed. If our schedule was so easy, then why did the almighty powerhouse, SB favorite chargers fall to teams like the Rams & Seahawks? Because it's not that easy, no matter who you play. The Chiefs showed up and did their job.
If the Chargers had squeaked into the playoffs, no one would say shit about their soft schedule.
So why does it have to be such an issue in regards to the Chiefs? It's BS.
Haters gonna hate.