Thread: Science I Have A Question
View Single Post
Old 02-05-2011, 11:27 AM   #7
FAX FAX is offline
testing ... 1, 2, 3
 
FAX's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tennessee
Casino cash: $6753759
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Mac View Post
Seems they are always finding more information on the supposedly "evolving" ignorant humans from past generations, in that they were actually quite advanced and intelligent.

Coarse I believe that humans that were relatively intelligent from the git-go. So new findings supporting this, doesn't really surprise me, but do find it fascinating.
My real trouble is this; whenever an archaeological find is made that appears to be outside the "traditional and generally accepted views", those discoveries are treated like pseudoarchaeology right off the bat.

There are established cases, for example, (wish I had the links handy) of digs that have turned up ceramic artifacts whose rehydroxylation and thermoluminescence dating have placed them at well over 200,000 years old. That's, of course, impossible according to the accepted timeline of human cultural development. Every time this has happened (so far as I can tell), those results are deemed erroneous and peer-reviewed journals refuse to publish.

It appears to me that there is almost a conspiracy or something ... if the shoe don't fit, chop off their legs kind of deal.

FAX
Posts: 44,492
FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.FAX is obviously part of the inner Circle.
     Reply With Quote