Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy
-Jamaal Charles played a substancial amount down the stretch and Cassel's numbers got WORSE.
But you're right, let's pretend like 2009 was a throw-away year and not be able to analyze anything.
**** yourself.
|
Did Cassel really play worse? His QB rating was worse, but primarily because Haley actually had Cassel throwing downfield, and he through some picks. But overall offensively, pre-bye, our offense was a joke. Post-bye, it was probably close to NFL-average. 2 of the last 3 games we had 490 yards or more.
My guess is Haley doesn't think we have the WRs to spread the field. ****ers can't get open, so may as well keep them in to block.
Look, nothing in Haley's bio suggests that we are going to see Herm II. Everything in Herm's bio and rhetoric suggested he did plan to play not-to-lose. Ironically, Herm was given the benefit of the doubt, and no one thought he would mess with the offense....whereas with Haley, the opposite seems to be true.
I think our offense will be better next year, but it will be hard to compare, given we are moving from essentially the easiest schedule the NFL to the hardest. If Haley sucks as an offensive coach, get rid of his ass, because that is what he is supposed to bring to the table. Haley will earn his paycheck next year or get fired.