Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc
Then by all means please educate me. Simply saying something is stupid doesn't do a whole lot to further a discussion.
And you can essentially throw Cassel completely out of the discussion, at least for 2009. I'm simply talking about Sanchez on his own merits. Explain to me why Sanchez in Kansas City in 2009 would have been a better quarterback than Sanchez in New York was the same year. Or how Sanchez in 2009 would have turned a 4-12 Chiefs squad into at the very least a 9-7 team. Because that's what it would have taken to get the team into the playoffs, and for the equivalent of his playoff performances that year with the Jets to happen.
Then please feel free to go into what his impact on the 2010 regular season would have been, and then the 2010 playoffs. I'm certainly all ears. And I probably won't call anything you say stupid.
|
Sanchez is a better QB, however slight it may be, to say that they aren't in the same situation and somewhat better is reeruned. Just like this argument.
Everyone on this forum is saying we need a better QB to be better but if we had Sanchez (a better QB than Cassel) we might not make the playoffs last year because he only threw for 17 TD's and 13 INT's on a different ****ing team.