Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan
Charles was here in 2009 for the whole season. The Chiefs scored 18.4 points.
In 2010, the Chiefs scored 22.9. Again, JC was here the whole season.
In 2011, the Chiefs are averaging 15.65 points per game with Cassel in.
JC played the first game in which the Chiefs scored seven points.
As far as Moss/Welker. Yes, they are great. But, McDaniels was able to get over 25 points a game out of a Cassel led offense. You think he would struggle this much with Cassel along with Bowe, Breaston, Baldwin, and McCluster?
Heck, McCluster would probably look like a legit second round pick if we had McDaniels calling the plays instead of Staley Haley.
Heck, look at what he was able to do with Brandon freaking LLoyd and Eddie Royal.
So, to sum it up, yes, I think that Haley is the biggest problem on this offense.
That isn't completely true. I think that Haley doesn't have enough time to be HC and OC and I don't think he can work with a good offensive coordinator.
|
Charles barely played until the games against the Jags. Obviously him being on the bench is not what I meant. I'm rather disappointed I have to explain that.
The numbers are there. 20 PPG with charles, 13 PPG without him.
Using him for 2 carries or returning kicks does not count in my eyes. Sorry champ. Charles was a difference maker.
McCluster is not good. You guys need to just accept that he's a slow 5-7 RB who can't break or elude tackles. It's not coaching. He's just not that good. He's a shitty version of Dante Hall. A smaller, slower, less elusive version of Hall. A gadget player without the talent to fill that role. He's not an impact player. He's proven that over the course of 2 seasons. We get him in space over and over and he does NOTHING.
Again, you think the NFL is all about coaching. I'm still sticking with talent. KC would have won no more than 6 games without Charles last season and Weis AND Cassel would have been terrible.