Quote:
Originally Posted by bricks
Orton is the most conservative choice.
But this shouldn't be about being conservative.
It should be more about taking risks. Your team is 5-8. WTF do you have to lose by playing a rookie QB with three games remaining?
Orton is what he is, an average quarterback. You don't know what you have in Stanzi, but you drafted him, so why not play him?
Whats there to lose? He sucks, he sucks. So what? And if he is good, then all the better, and Romeo looks like a genious for playing him and everybody will love him after.
If the decision was to start Stanzi, and he ends up playing well, wouldn't it be more gratifying and rewarding for Crennel? Im looking at this with a different perspective.
|
That`s why I said Romeo puts his interest before the team.
We do not expect nothing from Stanzi. If he does well, that`s an encouraging sign for the future. If he is bad, well we perfectly understand it and he`ll have other chances in the future.
Nothing good can come of playing Orton. Selling tickets?? Hell, I`d buy a ticket ten times more if Stanzi was actually starting but maybe Chiefs fans think otherwise?