Quote:
Originally Posted by SenselessChiefsFan
The offense was actually quite a bit different. It allowed the QB to have more time and give the WR's more time to get open.
I am kind of sick of arguing.
Cassel isn't great, he just isn't as bad as the guys on here think.
And, forgive me for not wanting to change my opinion of Orton after one game against a bad defense.
I have seen Orton for five years. One year doesn't completely change history.
|
Cassel is awful at selling playaction fakes
He sells the screen way too soon whereas orton coolly waits for it to develop. He also has absolutely no touch--the screen recipient always has to reach high to gnab it
Orton for the most part was on target all day whereas cassel is far too inaccurate for a starting qb
In almost every game in his career, cassel has taken about 2 quarters to warm up. Orton was great from the get go
Orton scans the entire field. Cassel panics when the primary read is off. Then he usually checks down.
Saw orton in the pre snap actually making adjustments. Case in point... First pass of the game, blitz came left and he immediately gunned it to the hot route
The oline was significantly better because orton was punishing gb when they chose to blitz. That's what good qbs do. Cassel does not.
Name one thing cassel does better than orton? Because I can't think of a single thing. Both have no track record of clutch play. Orton throws a better deep ball. He throws a more accurate ball. He actually reads defenses pre snaps. He has a much better feel for the position like selling play fakes, having the recognition to run a quick count on a wr screen, etc...Tell me ONE THING.