Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega
Not really. We're talking the vast, vast majority of super bowl winning head coaches are under 60. Like, 24 of 27 if my math is right.
The odds are so low, the idea that we would just hand Romeo the job is shockingly stupid.
And those ancient head coaches also had superior quarterbacks. Where's Romeo's?
|
The historic odds are low, I see. But did you also take into account how many coaches were actually 60 or older during those seasons also? The point Phobia was making is that "Of course there aren't many SB winners over 60 years old, because the majority of coaches are 60 or younger."
Just paraphrasing.