Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega
Coughlin and "interim" Romeo.
That's it.
Clearly we should follow this developing trend.
|
So your entire argument is that due to the fact that he has lived 64 years he isn't qualified to coach the Chiefs? You base this on "trends" in the NFL...
then answer my question.. why are there no coaches with names that start with a D? THAT TREND MUST MEAN SOMETHING RIGHT????
I'm gonna try to force you to USE your brain for once... please explain why one "trend" is more meaningful then the other?
Have you heard an NFL exec voice an opinion that 64 years old is the cutoff for an effective coach? Or is this just another thing you pulled out of your ass?
(just to be clear, I'm not sold on Romeo yet but Clayton is an idiot, so I going to bury his idiotic ramblings in this thread)