Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
Not sure what you're getting at.
YAC, in large part, is a product of the QB delivering the ball accurately and on time.
In New England, McDumbass kept it as simple as he could for Cassel, and essentially ran a college spread in order to maximize Cassel's production.
When it gets more complicated than that, Cassel can not deliver the ball accurately and on time.
As for Orton, while he can do this in a more complicated offense, he absolutely has to have everything working for him to be effective.
If things start to break down, he is terrible.
I want a QB that can carry his team when things break down.
I don't want a QB that has to be carried, and Orton is one that has to be carried.
|
Orton doesn't need EVERYTHING else working to be effective. But he does need SOMETHING else working.
In this era a free agency and salary caps, teams can no longer build dynastic teams that are strong EVERYWHERE. So they have to pick and choose where they focus their strengths. Passing Offense, Running Offense, Special Teams, or Defense. Teams need to have it working in at least TWO of those areas to be successful. No NFL QB is going to get very far nowadays without some help from one of those other areas.
Give Orton a team that's decent in any one of those areas and he can run a passing Offense well enough for a winning team. Last weekend, I saw a Chiefs team that was executing well on Defense and running the ball well. That allowed the passing game some room to work and the result was a win over the unbeaten defending SB Champs...