Quote:
Originally Posted by DRU
I find it funny that a journalist would waste his time on this sort of thing, and I find it even more funny that those few of you who read the article post the negative quotes and comments for the others to read, but leave out the positive or indifferent stuff that just as many people said.
For every negative quote in the article there's another one from somebody saying it's no big deal and it doesn't bother them. Both from people who are still there and those who aren't. One even talked about how the same fears and feelings were evident when Peterson took over years ago.
New management took over. Some people were let go, and some people weren't. It happens everywhere with business, large and small.
The candy wrapper thing is nothing, but you guys are acting like Pioli is the devil because of it. I've seen that example of proving the "attention to detail" point in lots of business management books and I've heard it used at business conferences as well. It's supposed to illustrate how an entire team of people work together to ensure that every small detail is handled within an organization. The point is that if so many people are walking by a piece of trash in their work place and nobody ever picks it up, what other "trash" are they seeing and doing nothing about? It's a simple concept and was most likely used to spark the conversation in the meeting.
This whole thing is being blown way out of proportion.
|
Translation: I'm going to cover my eyes, and stick my fingers in my ears.
What whole thing is blown out of proportion?
The fact that the Chiefs produce a shit product, hold employees accountable, but the GM and the quarterback are held to a different standard?