Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
The workers who said it wasn't toxic spoke on the record and the article said most of them had a PR person present. It's hard to imagine that any of those guys are going to say anything negative. It goes without saying that it's far more interesting that only the current workers who were listed as "anonymous" seemed to have more negative things to say.
If Gretz's accusation is true that the Chiefs were threatening lawsuits for these interviews, that's a really bad statement about the lengths the Chiefs will go to control their reputation. And it makes it a lot harder to really believe their credibility.
Your last point is a fair point. But again, they are throwing out ideas and allowing us to react to them. I don't think gum wrappers and coffees is a big deal--I think that level of accountability is a good thing. There are other things in this article that scare the shit out of me.
|
Yeah the lawsuit thing, I get that and tend to think that is a little on the shitty side.
I just think people who hate Pioli are using this to burn him at the stake. Don't get me wrong hte dude has made mistakes, but say we don't lose our two best players this year, Mo and Cassel stay healthy, we win 9 or 10 games, make the playoffs and just beat the Steelers and lost to the Pats.
If all that happened and this article came out, what would be the reaction?