Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo
No dumber than taking a safety in the top five.
It's a position that can and usually is filled with guys that can be found later in the draft and a position that is associated with a shorter longevity because of heightened injury potential. (Case in point - Berry. If he comes back from the knee injury and is fine, great. But what if he doesn't? Was it the right pick then? And to this point, he's been primarily a run defender and a liability in the passing game. I like the kid a lot, but let's not go annoitting him the next Paul Krause after one mixed rookie season. And yeah, he went to the Pro Bowl, but so did Matt Cassel.) How often has Polamalu and Bob Sanders been injured over their careers?
|
Using injuries as a reason for Berry being a bad pick is so far past dumb that I dont even know where to start.
Oh, yeah I do.
Your dumbass wanted us to draft Okung who has missed 10 games to injury and hasn't been anything special when he has played.
Berry > all of your picks
Albert > Okung
Case closed.
If we move down into the late teens or early 20s, Konz would be a damn good pick...at 11, it would be overspending.
Hudson gives us the versatility to sit back till the second or third round to pick the best guard or center available and let Hudson take over the other spot.