Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGuardian
/facepalm
Ok let's clear a few facts up.
You can get stronger and not get faster. Fact.
You can get faster without getting stronger. Fact.
Two guys that bench press 315 as their max. Who is more powerful? The guy that can press it faster. The other guy can't press it as fast because THAT part of muscular function is dictated by how his central nervous system fires.
A guy can get stronger and not get faster because he isn't WIRED to be fast. it's a neurological thing, not a strength thing.
A guy can get faster, and not have gotten stronger. It's a neurological thing.
According to what you write, getting stronger is the key for a sprinter to get faster. This is not true. A sprinter gets faster by working on the rate of turnover in his stride. The body becomes more efficient from a motor skill perspective by doing this repeated movement. Stronger muscles doesn't always mean he can perform this movement more efficiently.
The same applies here. A guy can get stronger, but have shitty swinging mechanics, which LOTS of major league guys do, just like LOTS of NFL quarterbacks have shitty throwing mechanics, and getting stronger will not fix this.
Thus your argument is completely invalid. If it were true, then Strength and Conditioning coaches would be the second highest paid coaches on the god damn team. But they made bread crumbs compared to everyone else. If all it took was to have a bunch of guys batting better was to get them stronger, then S&C coaches would be looked at as gold. They aren't.
You guys are way out of your element arguing with me on this.
Case closed.
|
You are so ****ing dense, it's ridiculous. Of course it's possible to get stronger without getting faster and vice versa. We aren't comparing two different people, though. We are comparing the same person. All else being equal, a professional baseball player is going to have increased bat speed as he gets stronger. It's really no more complicated than that; for non troglodytes, anyway.