Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinChief
No they definitely weren't good by any stretch. As I said, 25-27 range is where I'd put them.
I just hate "systems" like PFF where they try to pass of garbage guesses as if they are STATS and FACTS. They aren't, they are guesses and opinions.
|
Like any stat, it's a tool to give an idea on how things are.
But you have to watch yourself to really have an educated opinion about any of it.
It's like David Carr and the Houston Texans.
If you look at sacks allowed while he was the QB, you'd come away thinking those guys had to be the worst O-Line ever.
But if you watch, you'd come away understanding that, while they weren't good, they weren't nearly as bad as David Carr made them look with those numbers.