Quote:
Originally Posted by FRCDFED
Bear with me for a minute.......I didn't see the game so my opinion is based merely on what I have read in the media specifically on Crennels response to why Jamal was only given 5 carries for the game.
Is it possible that Pioli/Crennel/Daboll attempted to sabotage B. Quinn's first start on the team by inserting a game plan that limited the use of the running game and was designed to force Quinn to pass more than expected?
I mean, wouldn't you break in a new starting QB by using the teams strength (running game) to create opportunities to build confidence and succeed in the passing game? Start off with some runs followed by some play action to keep the defense honest. Then move on to short slants and high percentage throws to build confidence and establish a tempo with the receivers?
So again I ask.....is it possible that the three stooges attempted to put in a game plan to sabotage Quinn but that it backfired only because Quinn went down with and injury and they couldn't change the entire game plan thereby forcing them to roll with what they had?
Just asking.............because that is the ONLY reason I can come up with that you give Jamal ****ING Charles only 5 carries in a ****ING game!!!
|
I think you could not be more wrong. I think Crennel is definitely in Quinn's corner as Pioli has only recently given him the go ahead on him. If you go back to the Tampa game, the first thing RAC said was IT IS NOT THE QBS fault! He was not asked about quarterback. He offered it up of his own accord. Added to that, he has every excuse to go ahead and name Cassel the starter this week. . . ie Cassel playing well and Quinn being hurt, but he said that Quinn is the guy if he can practice. I think Romeo is all in on Quinn right now