02-22-2013, 02:55 PM
|
#5
|
|
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2007
Casino cash: $6654388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
Ideally, the Chiefs fall in love with a QB and take him #1 overall. If they don't, the second best option IMO is to take him at #34.
What would really be disheartening to me, in this particular draft, is for the Chiefs to pass on a QB #1 overall, then trade up into the first round to draft a QB. At that point, you're wasting precious resources that can be used for other areas of need (S, ILB, CB, WR, etc.).
If a guy is good enough at #20, take him at #1. Don't waste a #2 and #4 to get him at 20. That's just plain dumb.
|
Depends on what the cost is to move up at the end of the first to grab that qb
__________________
Mismanaging the clock.
|
|
Posts: 22,541
|
|