Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie
Anyone in the top half of the starting QBs qualifies for that statement. I don't think, as bad as you want to paint him, he was 15th or 16th, while Cassel was 32nd. So the point was and still is there is no ****ing comparison between the two.
|
So you think that there is no or a negligible difference between Rodgers at #1 and say, Smith at 16 because they're both in the top half of starting QBs?