Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Who cares if there is a plug and play? This team isn't winning anything anyway next year.
Besides, no QB who threw for as few yards and TDs as Smith led his team to anything. He didn't steer the season into the ditch. He was also a bigger reason why they lost the NFCCG than Kyle Williams.
Finally, there might not be a better QB in a vacuum than Smith this year, but essentially you are making the same argument that you decry others for by intimating we have to take a QB. We had options:
1) Draft a QB with 1.1
2) Draft a QB with 2.34
3) Draft a QB with a high pick and sign a vet backup
4) Sign a vet starter
5) Trade for a vet starter
We chose the worst of all options. We could have signed Matt Moore and still had flexibility in this or next year's draft. Now, we've hamstrung ourselves at 1.1, we don't have 2.34, and we're going to lose our 2nd or 3rd rounder next year.
|
Do we have absolute confirmation of the terms of the deal yet? For what it's worth, my preferred method would be 4 than 2.
Like I said I don't agree with all, but we did sign a vet starter and maybe, just maybe we can come out with a qb of the future.