Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish
Yeah, Alex Smith just needed more weapons. That excuse was pretty popular with Cassel apologists too. The poor guy just had no talent around him. Well... bullshit. Good QBs make those around them better. Their performance isn't directly determined by those around them. Because that's indication that they're not a positive influence on their team. It indicates that they're very dependent on those around them. Which isn't a quality of a franchise QB.
And save the poor ol' mean GM against Alex Smith theory. That's laughable. GMs like winners, and those who improve their team. It's dependent on Smith's on field performance, not some imagined personal matter.
The only change in Alex Smith's performance is directly related to Jim Harbaugh. Who also gave up on him and traded him away.
|
the 49ers had the worst ranked O-line from 04-08. Period. End of story. Go back to rounds 1-2 and find out how many O-lineman they drafted in the 1st round for the following 5 years.... I wont beat a dead horse with you to point out the obvious.. AKA the 49ers have 4 1st round O-lineman on there team.
And the GM theory?? Uhm.. Raiders fired there HC after al davis died because why? What was the HC's reason? "The GM, They want there own HC, thats how it is in the NFL". Google is your friend.. Its the same with QB's. If you cant read between the lines and are blind then thats on you but you obviousley dont have a clue on how the nfl works... Why would a GM want to win a superbowl that he didnt draft or trade for ? A qb he just inherited from someone else?? Again.. GM's want QB's they trade for or draft. Period end of story again.
Andy reid is high on alex.. Are you a better evelauator and coach than andy reid? Are you? yeah. thats what i thought. Your a waiste of time.