Quote:
Originally Posted by HotCarl
He will be 29 during the season. That's an almost 30 year old player with an emerging history of back trouble. They seem to feel good about his back - good enough to make only a one-year commitment to him. But back problems don't usually go away once they begin.
If we don't find a successor, we'll be complaining about the terrible protection and the huge hole we have at the second most important position on offense in 1-2 years.
And as important as QBs are, you can't win the super bowl with a hole at LT
|
Then replace him in the 2014 draft. You can ALWAYS find quality LTs in the draft. Have we ever been in a bad position to draft one? EVER?
If the #1 pick is to be a "for the future" move, we need to go with the QB.
Not that you'll make any sense out of this. You'll just pooh pooh it and keep pounding the same true fan hammer