Quote:
Originally Posted by HotCarl
He will be 29 during the season. That's an almost 30 year old player with an emerging history of back trouble. They seem to feel good about his back - good enough to make only a one-year commitment to him. But back problems don't usually go away once they begin.
If we don't find a successor, we'll be complaining about the terrible protection and the huge hole we have at the second most important position on offense in 1-2 years.
And as important as QBs are, you can't win the super bowl with a hole at LT
|
Is this satire? If so, well done. If not, I sincerely hope Dorsey agrees with you. To find a Super Bowl champion with a hole at LT, you have to go all the way back to 2011. Or 2010. Or 2009.