Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus
I'm trying to find any kind of sense that this deal might make and I'm coming up completely dry. Giving a 33 year old QB that's been given as many years and as much talent as he has to take you to the big one even more time is ****ing idiotic on so many levels.
Ah well, it'll be nice watching those Cowboy fans constantly disappointed for the next 6 years.
|
Tony Romo has a
career passer rating of 95. The amount of shit that guy takes is just stupid.
Romo's a
good quarterback. He's a 65% passer that averages 8yds/attempt and has the mobility to make up for some shoddy protection.
He's easily a top 15 guy and, like Flacco, probably sits somewhere in the 8-12 range.
People keep blasting him as a bad post-season QB but he's only played in 4 posts-season games and he's been just fine in 2 of them. The last 3 years the Cowboys missed the playoffs because they've had a wildly overrated defense. Moreover, his 'weapons' are being overrated as well. Austin's almost always hurt, Bryant
finally had a decent year this season and he's never had much of a running game to work with.
If Eric Decker plays well with Manning, people say "Man, Manning is a god". When Romo gets a great season from Laurent !@#$ing Robinson, people just shrug and act like Robinson must've actually been a badass and we didn't know it. Romo's absolutely made his weapons look better than they are on many occasions.
Romo's a hell of a quarterback, a good leader and he's tough as nails. You give him the exact same team as Joe Flacco and yeah - I'd take Romo over Flacco for at least the next couple of years. And while I recognize that not everyone would agree with that, I certainly don't see how you can say that Flacco is at all clearly better than Romo.