Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
I did. Geno is not a franchise QB like you are claiming. Hell he's not that great of a QB prospect at that.
If we take a QB, I want a guy who we believe can be a franchise QB one day. It's obvious that we aren't the only one's who believe Geno isn't that guy.
The LT's are the best prospects in this draft and that's our plan.
|
How was that even CLOSE to what I was ****ing asking?
You claim Joeckel/Fisher are the best players in this draft, presumedly taking into account positional value and all that other good stuff. On the topic of positional value, I asked, "As Geno relates to the top prospects as a QB, at what position would athletes with the ranking of Joeckel/Fisher have to play for Geno to receive a better ranking than them on your big board?"
I'll explain again. Geno as a QB has his ranking on your big board. Fisher/Joeckel have theirs as OTs. Now, compared to other OTs in other draft classes, and comparing those players to THEIR draft classes, if players at the rankings of Joeckel/Fisher played say... WR... would they still be ranked ahead of Geno?
I ask, because surely you wouldn't come across the Luke Joeckel of OGs and say we should take him before Geno, right? So when do you stop with this nonsense? Geno, by the nature of being the top QB in a draft class, is worth WAY MORE than a Geno Smith who plays OT.
So... (I can't believe I'm doing this for you) if you answer my question, your response will take the form of a POSITION.
What would Joeckel have to play to be outranked by Geno?