Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
I've said this before.
People, including NFL personnel people, were looking at this QB draft through a prism skewed by last year's draft, and to a certain extent, by the previous draft.
I have always, and still, believe(d) that you take a QB high if you believe he has all the physical tools to be a franchise QB.
I don't believe that NFL personnel people think that Geno Smith lacks the physical tools.
Their questions were of the "Is he ready to start day one?" variety.
I don't think there's any question that he has all the phsical tools, and if he needs a year or 2 of seasoning on the bencch, so be it.
I take him 1.1.
|
Oh I loved the stats he put up- his highlights looked awesome- I want a Qb we can build on soo freaking bad believe me. teams like the Colts get manning and then Luck- but we get the has beens. Having Dawson win it all then going to what we have had since then- You would have to think they see the direct correlation to a Franchise QB and a consistently winning team.
But that remains to be seen if they learned anything from last year. I think they did- but came into a bad year to turn over a new "Leaf" so to speak-lol
I was down on the chiefs as bad as anyone on here. With the murder suicide and the fan upheaval- I don't think I have seen a team sink so low. But I think Clark did everything he could to turn it around. i dont knwo what else besides drafting different people he could have done??