Quote:
Originally Posted by lcarus
Oh I must have missed his contributions. I remember he was a worthless piece of shit. I'd rather have McCluster.
|
And McCluster is... NOT a worthless piece of shit?
Parker is better because the Chiefs didn't treat him like he was Dante ****ing Hall. They didn't design specific gadget plays for him or take away carries from their outstanding RBs Priest and Larry to get him touches, all under the false notion that "he's super quick!"
McCluster ran a 4.6, was weak, light, and couldn't hold onto the ball. Parker was more annoying, but only because of his showboating.
Parker was absolutely the better player.