Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
And McCluster is... NOT a worthless piece of shit?
Parker is better because the Chiefs didn't treat him like he was Dante ****ing Hall. They didn't design specific gadget plays for him or take away carries from their outstanding RBs Priest and Larry to get him touches, all under the false notion that "he's super quick!"
McCluster ran a 4.6, was weak, light, and couldn't hold onto the ball. Parker was more annoying, but only because of his showboating.
Parker was absolutely the better player.
|
It's not even close.
If he didn't become "first down Sammie" he'd have been a hell of a lot more palatable for us.
Parker was an irritating little shit, but he did get open and actually came up with some decent catches on occasion.
Dexter McCluster has hurt the team every time a play designed to get him the ball was called. And that's really the only time he touched it because he's been incapable to this point of making a difference when he's simply operating as part of a normal offense.
McCluster is awful. If we could trade him, I'd be just fine with it.
Anyone have a Center we could use? I'd deal McCluster for a legitimate starting C in a heartbeat.