Wouldn't smarter money be on the 55% who WERE 1st round picks if we're going to use that as a measure of smart ways to find Super Bowl QBs?
I mean, I'd rather it be about the PERCENTAGE of those QBs that do great things instead of just looking at the number of those type of players that won Super Bowls.
A shit ton of undrafted QBs won Super Bowls, you say? Interesting. How many of them are there in any given year compared to the number of QBs drafted in the first round?
And even if you want to say, "All that means is there's no one way to acquire a Super Bowl winning QB", why would you completely ignore the most successful classification of Super Bowl-winning QBs? To not go for ANYONE of that group in 30 years, that is.
|