Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan
It is quite easy to say that things need to be accomplished without Charles in the offense, but should we not use Charles to gain every possible advantage we can? Every offense has that fulcrum player. For some teams it is a QB, but in actuality how many teams can boast that? If it's a RB then fine we need to leverage that ability to the max. We are what we are. This is how we win; but to act like it is as easy as snapping your fingers, and finding a player that can replace Charles, as the focal point of the offense, is asinine.
|
How did I say we should not use Charles? I believe I said the opposite.
__________________
1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously.
100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO ****ing rings as a Head Coach.
CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020!
|