Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cosmo20002
Sure there is--KU lost 1 game, MU lost 2.
What, because MU beat KU, MU 'deserves' to go? By that logic, Kentucky 'deserves' to be in the national title game because they beat LSU. Or Colorado 'deserves' a BCS bowl because they beat Oklahoma.
The system is f'd up--always has been. But outside of the title game, no one is entitled to anything. The BCS isn't set up so that the top 10 teams get the bowl slots. After the top 2, its just a draft of the eligible teams.
Frankly, I don't see what the big deal is. KU and MU are both going to the same place--the 'Not the National Title Game Bowl.' If you're not playing for the title, who cares?
|
There is a reason nobody is making those points...
They are straw men.
Nobody is saying App. St is better than Michigan here. This isn't a 4 win team saying they are better than KU because MU beat them.
The win difference is 1. MU has a big north title...is ahead of KU in the BCS, coaches, and AP polls.
Did I mention KU hasn't beaten a top 40 team?