|
I don't get the head-to-head argument, either, since the committee put in a NC St. team that went 0-3 vs Clemson. All 3 losses were by double digits. Not saying Clemson deserved to be in (they had 2 bad Q4 losses and a shitty non-conference schedule), but point is that H2H doesn't mean much.
Granted, I think the selection process needs to be more subjective. Kansas being the #2 overall seed over Houston because they had more Q1 opportunities and Oklahoma St. missing because they didn't have as many Q1 wins relative to how many Q1 games they played is stupid logic.
|