Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19
Signing ET is the kind of move that Seattle and Denver made years ago that put them over the hump to win Super Bowls (Ware, Talib, Michael Bennett, etc) so I really think Veach will look into it hard.
But trading for Ramsey would be just an insane boost for this team. Even if you’re worried about his attitude or whatever, how big of a problem is it when they’re winning? He’d finally be playing with a competent QB. I think it’s a great fit.
|
I'm assuming the Raiders will offer one of their 1's. Which will be higher that ours. They will ask for a 2nd too to beat the Raiders.
The complication is you are only getting 2 years out of the guy. We cant pay the guy after that. We have Hill and Hunt due in 2 years also. We have to pay Hill. Now its a Ramsey/Hunt choice. Mahomes next year after that. Jones is going to get paid. etc.etc.
It boils down to we go all in for these last 2 years of the rookie deals with our core players? Sacrifice a 1st/2nd?
Does Ramsey help our defense more than the 1st/2nd? For those two years, seems the answer is obvious to me anyway, yes. If only for 2 years, is it worth it? Again, for me anyway, who's been waiting for another Super Bowl win since hippies were protesting in the streets, the answer is hell yes, count me in.