Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBone
I don't understand this line of thinking. Isn't the burden of proof usually on the person making accusations?
How exactly is somebody supposed to provide proof that the games aren't rigged?
|
One side wants a memo telling officials who shall win (and nothing less will do), so our side wants some proof that officials are actually graded and disciplined for calls they made, didn't make, and that they called things both ways.
The truth is, there are no memos and the NFL won't ever release any outcomes of their officials review process (because if there really is one it's a farce as it relates to any disciplinary actions).
And why would only one side have to prove their opinion? That seems wrong to me. Because of faith and taking the league's word on everything?